看GRE作文优秀范文分析，学习一下如何写出一篇完美的GRE作文。希望对大家的GRE写作备考有帮助。

Do we learn more from people whose ideas we share in common than from those whose ideas contradict ours? The speaker claims so, for the reason that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. I concede that undue discord can impede learning. Otherwise, in my view we learn far more from discourse and debate with those whose ideas we oppose than from people whose ideas are in accord with our own.

Admittedly, under some circumstances disagreement with others can be counterproductive to learning. For supporting examples one need look no further than a television set. On today's typical television or radio talk show, disagreement usually manifests itself in meaningless rhetorical bouts and shouting matches, during which opponents vie to have their own message heard, but have little interest either in finding common ground with or in acknowledging the merits of the opponent's viewpoint. Understandably, neither the combatants nor the viewers learn anything meaningful. In fact, these battles only serve to reinforce the predisPOSTTTIONs and biases of all concerned. The end result is that learning is impeded.

Disagreement can also inhibit learning when two opponents disagree on fundamental assumptions needed for meaningful discourse and debate. For example, a student of paleontology learns little about the evolution of an animal species under current study by debating with an individual whose religious belief system precludes the possibility of evolution to begin with. And, economics and finance students learn little about the dynamics of a laissez-faire system by debating with a socialist whose view is that a centralized power should control all economic activity.

Aside from the foregoing two provisos, however, I fundamentally disagree with the speaker's claim. Assuming common ground between two rational and reasonable opponents willing to debate on intellectual merits, both opponents stand to gain much from that debate. Indeed it is primarily through such debate that human knowledge advances, whether at the personal, community, or global level.

At the personal level, by listening to their parents' rationale for their seemingly oppressive rules and policies teenagers can learn how certain behaviors naturally carry certain undesirable consequences. At the same time, by listening to their teenagers' concerns about autonomy and about peer pressures parents can learn the valuable lesson that effective parenting and control are two different things. At the community level, through dispassionate dialogue an environmental activist can come to understand the legitimate economic concerns of those whose jobs depend on the continued profitable operation of a factory. Conversely, the latter might stand to learn much about the potential public health price to be paid by ensuring job growth and a low unemployment rate. Finally, at the global level, two nations with opposing political or economic interests can reach mutually beneficial agreements by striving to understand the other's legitimate concerns for its national security, its political sovereignty, the stability of its economy and currency, and so forth.

In sum, unless two opponents in a debate are each willing to play on the same field and by the same rules, I concede that disagreement can impede learning. Otherwise, reasoned discourse and debate between people with opposing viewpoints is the very foundation upon which human knowledge advances. Accordingly, on balance the speaker is fundamentally correct.

下面，我们一起来分析一下范文。从开头段开始：Do we learn more from people whose ideas we share in common than from those whose ideas contradict ours? 第一句话用疑问句改写题目结论，引出话题。The speaker claims so, for the reason that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. I concede that undue discord can impede learning. 第二句表明自己同意题目中的原因有一定的合理性，然后直接加转折，引出自己的真正立场：认为从与自己观点不同的人身上会学到更多的东西。Otherwise, in my view we learn far more from discourse and debate with those whose ideas we oppose than from people whose ideas are in accord with our own.

issue的开头需要包括的内容就是两方面：一是改写题目，而是表明自己的立场。范文中用疑问句改写题目，同时清晰明了的表明了自己对题目的立场，剪短有力。是同学们在写作的时候可以多加练习的开头方式。

接下来，我们来看第二段和第三段：先从结构上来看，每段都是第一句表达作者观点：认为意见不一致在某些情况下阻碍了学习;然后分别举了不是以学习为目的而是单纯的以争论为目的辩论和本质上基础理念不同的两个人之见的相互学习，这两个例子，来照应第一段中对的让步部分，支持了题目中的原因：某些情况下，意见相左会阻碍学习。

在看第四段，是承上启下的过渡段，第一句Aside from the foregoing two provisos, however, I fundamentally disagree with the speaker's claim.承接上文，除了上面讲到的两种情况，作者不同意题目的结论。Assuming common ground between two rational and reasonable opponents willing to debate on intellectual merits, both opponents stand to gain much from that debate.这一句则是对让步的部分取非：两个人虽然意见不同，但是知识基础是一致的，并且有学习的意愿，然后从正面表达自己的观点：这种情况下，意见不同的双方都会从辩论中学到更多。

第三句：Indeed it is primarily through such debate that human knowledge advances, whether at the personal, community, or global level. 引出了下文将要从个人、社会以及全球三个方面对自己的观点进行论证。

然后进入第五段，顺应第四段中提到的三个方向，个人方面以家长和孩子的立场不同为例，社会方面以环保组织和经济发展之间的矛盾为例，全球方面以国家间的不同利益为例，表明了意见不同的双方其实是可以学到更多的东西的。

   推荐阅读：

gre论坛 http://bbs.bailiedu.com/
gmat论坛http://bbs.bailiedu.com/
托福写作机经 http://bbs.bailiedu.com/forum-41-1.html
gre报名流程http://bbs.bailiedu.com/forum-50-1.html

最后结尾段，再次总结：除了基本知识领域不同并且不愿意学习的两种情况以外，作者整体上是反对题目中的观点的。再一次确立了自己的立场。

现在前程百利老师带大家来回顾一下GRE作文优秀范文分析这篇文章：思路清晰，结构严谨，开头表达立场，论证中小部分让步，支持题目原因，中间有过渡，承上启下，引出自己主要立场，并且分三个层面对自己的立场进行论证，最后结尾总结，重申立场。通篇下来行文犹如行云流水，没有特别难的句子，但是观点清晰，例子以及讲道理充分到位，这就是同学们需要学习的地方。无需追求过于复杂的句子来提分，有清晰的观点，有充分的例子，整篇文章逻辑思路清晰流畅即可。希望各位考生可以在优秀范文中提炼出适合自己的写作方式。